FAQ Tag: UOC(Universal Objective Condemnation)

[ 6 ] Does the Ministry of the Keys disprove UOJ?

What is The Ministry of The Keys?
On three occasions, Jesus gave his disciples (including you and me) the authority to bind and to loose sins. On one of these occasions, Jesus referred to this authority as using the keys of the kingdom of heaven.

~ Mt 16:19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

~ Mt 18:18 “I tell you the truth, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

~ John 20:23 If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”

In the first two passages above, we have similar wording, “whatever you bind…will be bound.” Here, it is worth noting that many would argue that a better translation might be, “what ever you bind…will have been bound.”

In other words, the binding has already been done in heaven and disciples of Jesus are merely recognizing this and pronouncing it to those who persist in their unbelief. Put still another way, the sins are not bound in heaven because of the pronouncement, rather the pronouncement comes due to the fact that sins remain bound in heaven.

Compare to UOJ
Now, let’s think this through, in light of UOJ. The pronouncement (on earth, if you will) that the unbeliever remains bound to his sins, is the direct result of the truth of this same reality in heaven…due to unbelief. In other words, this is the reality in the eyes of God. God sees the unbeliever as still bound to his sins, until faith should lay hold of the forgiveness of sins. Apart from faith, God does not see forgiveness, he sees sins held bound.

Want further evidence? Just look at the other half of these same two verses. By contrast, Jesus states that once sins are forgiven, disciples should pronounce the forgiveness of sins (or the loosening of sins). Again, we have a less than stellar translation on this half of the verses…whenever disciples pronounce the loosening of sins, it is due to the fact that faith has become evident (by confession, at least) and that the sins have therefore already been forgiven in heaven by the time a disciple pronounces it.

Now, the proponent of UOJ, may make the claim that the fact that the forgiveness of sins already exists before being pronounced, actually serves to prove the truth of UOJ. He might suggest that sins are already forgiven before forgiveness is pronounced, therefore UOJ must be true. But as I have just explained, there is also another possibility…that due to his new-found faith, forgiveness has become a reality, before the pronouncement of it. So, the simple fact that forgiveness exists before the pronouncement of it, does nothing to prove UOJ.

At this point, Jn 20:23 steps in to further disprove UOJ. In John, Jesus does not say, “whatever you bind…will have been bound,” rather he says (paraphrasing), “whatever you do not forgive, will not have been forgiven.”

Nail in the coffin…case closed!

The Ministry of the Keys disproves UOJ.

Let Scripture Interpret Scripture
While the teaching of UOJ would have us believe that all people of all time have been declared not guilty, free of sin, justified and even righteous, when we allow Scripture to interpret itself, we find that through the Ministry of the Keys we must reject this notion.

Jesus intends for us to go out and to share the good news with others, but what good news would proponents of UOJ have us believe we are to share? We are (according to UOJ) supposed to preach the good news that God has forgiven all people (applied this forgiveness to each individual), believer and unbeliever alike.

In other words, evangelizing to an unbeliever might look something like this:

Christian: “Friend, there is good news! God has forgiven all of your sins…full forgiveness applied to you in the eyes of God. And, this is true even if you don’t believe it!”

Unbeliever: “Great! If what you are saying is true, then why would I need to be a Christian – a believer?”

Christian (using the binding key): “Well, because if you don’t then you are still bound to your sins.”

Unbeliever: “But, you just said all of my sins are forgiven, even if I don’t believe it. How can I possibly be forgiven and bound to my sins at the same time?”

Christian: “Uhhh, that’s a great question. All I know is that, this is what my church says that the Bible says.”

Unbeliever: “Well, then either your church, or your God (or both) make no sense, since what you’ve just said completely contradicts itself. I thought you “Bible believing” Christians were all about absolute truth. How can truth contradict itself? And…explain to me again why would I want to have anything to do with being a Christian..and, for that matter, why would you?”

The Ministry of the Keys, by itself, disproves UOJ.

Which is more consistent with the entire testimony of Scripture, UOJ or JIC?

 

Go Back To Top of List

Go Back To Category Tabs

[ 3 ] Does UOC disprove UOJ?

What is UOC?
Universal Objective Condemnation (or UOC, as I have come to call it), by itself, disproves UOJ.

According to UOC, the whole world, according to their normal, natural sinful condition (apart from saving faith), stands separated from God and under his condemnation and wrath. This is universally and objectively true for all people whether they believe this or not.

UOJ & UOC Cannot Both Be True
In short, if UOC is true, then UOJ cannot be true, and if UOJ is true then UOC cannot be true.

This is the reality of the situation, no matter how much the proponent of UOJ tries to confuse the issue by attempting to separate the two into a law/gospel distinction – declaring that since condemnation is a matter of law and forgiveness is a matter of the gospel, both can be true of the same person, namely, each unbeliever. (See “Does the unpardonable sin disprove UOJ?” and “Does the gospel withheld disprove UOJ?” for a demonstration that this supposed law/gospel distinction is nonsensical according to Scripture.)

For, the unbeliever cannot rightly be declared, by God, to be condemned, unrighteous and lacking in the removal of (and the forgiveness of) sins as well as being declared justified, righteous and forgiven at the same time.

Elsewhere (in the tabs above), I’ve taken a somewhat detailed look at those “proof” passages which supposedly teach UOJ. At best, they are very questionable – normally due to having been yanked out of proper context (though not always). But what about UOC? Is the Bible also so sketchy on the subject of the universal condemnation of sinful man?

What God Says About UOC
Let’s take a look.

~ 2 Pt 2:9 – The Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteous for the day of judgment.

~ 1 Co 6:9 (NKJV) – Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God?

~ 1 Pt 3:18 – For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous [unjust in NKJV], to bring you to God.

~ Jn 3:18 – Whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.

~ Jn 3:36 – Whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on him.

~ Jn 16:8-9 – When he [the Spirit] comes, he will convict the world of guilt in regard to sin and righteousness and judgment: in regard to sin, because men do not believe in me.

~ Acts 3:19 Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.

UOC Verses Explained
While we could include a number of additional passages to the list above, those listed are more than sufficient to prove the point. The unrighteous (the unjust) stand condemned already with God’s wrath remaining on them, while they are also convicted (by the Holy Spirit) of their guilt for their unbelief.

Does this sound like objective justification (UOJ) or universal condemnation (UOC)? The Reality is that each of these passages speaks volumes against UOJ.

UOJ expressly teaches that all people, including the unbeliever, have been declared to be both just and righteous. Yet, the first 3 passages above specifically declare the unbeliever to be unjust or unrighteous.

Next, Jn 3:18 speaks specifically of the unbeliever standing condemned already. This does not say, he will be condemned (after death or on the last day), but that he has already been declared to be condemned (as he stands in his condemnation) as a direct result of his unbelief. The fact that he stands condemned is a statement of his being declared condemned. UOJ would have us believe he has been formally and legally declared both condemned and forgiven at the same time.

Moving on, Jn 3:36 tells us that God’s wrath remains on the unbeliever. Again, this does not say that in the end, he will receive God’s wrath, but that God’s wrath is already there, remaining on him. To be clear, this is not man’s guilt and condemnation (judgement) remaining on him, this is God’s wrath (anger, fury) which remains on him. Why would God’s wrath, anger and fury remain on him if God, himself, has declared him to be forgiven in his own sight?

Further, Jn 16:8-9 tells us that the Holy Spirit is at work in the world, among the unbelievers convicting them of their guilt resulting from their unbelief. Yet, UOJ expressly teaches that even the unbeliever’s guilt for sin has been removed (he has been formally declared “not guilty”), he is guilt free. (Note that when I refer to “guilt” here, I am not referring specifically to guilty feelings, I am referring to actual legal guilt vs. innocence.)

Finally, Acts 3:19 gives us the flip-side of the equation. Not only are unbelievers still guilty and condemned before God, but this verse expressly tells us that they still need to have their sins removed as well…they are still lacking in forgiveness as a result of the removal of sin.

In other words, though proponents of UOJ proclaim that there is a supposed law/gospel distinction to be made regarding universal condemnation (law) and supposed universal justification (gospel), this verse negates that possibility (see also Mt 12:31-32 and the unforgivable sin as well as “Does the gospel withheld disprove UOJ?“).

UOC, by itself, disproves UOJ.

Which is more consistent with the entire testimony of Scripture when we allow Scripture to interpret itself, UOJ or JIC?

 

Go Back To Top of List

Go Back To Category Tabs