Category Listings
This section addresses objections surrounding UOJ and is divided into tabs according to 3 categories below:
Category 3 (UOJ Proof Passages) could have easily fallen under either of the first two categories. For this reason and due to the fact that each proof passage contains a fairly detailed explanation, UOJ Proof Passages became its own category.
Instructions Each individual objection is presented as a question, a statement (in response to a question), or a proof passage…all in keeping with the each of the 3 categories, in a closed accordion style entry (to save space). Once opened, each listed entry contains the answer or analysis for each objection. To see each answer/analysis, simply click the large orange “+” symbol next to each question/statement. When finished with each answer/response, you can either close the response (click on the big orange “-” symbol) and open the next one or simply click on the next “+” symbol and the previous response will close automatically.
While it may be helpful to read each category tab, with each of its listed objections, all the way through one-at-a-time, you may also find it useful to skip around a bit.
Category Tabs
1) Direct Objections to UOJ2) Analyzing the Defense of UOJ3) UOJ Proof Passages
For Now Technically, according to the current “official” teachings of UOJ, proponents are quick to reject universalism (the belief that all people are saved) as being an unbiblical, heretical, teaching.
Associated with this, proponents of UOJ also reject any notion of new life or eternal life having been granted to all people apart from saving faith…for now.
Example 1 For example, here is a quote from a pro-UOJ resource:
“Objective justification is not the teaching that everyone, regardless of faith or unbelief, will be saved.” (Justification – Am I good enough for God?, Rolf Preus, page 3, Northwestern Publishing House).
Yet, in the very same booklet, it says this:
“Objective justification guarantees that the means of grace really are means of grace.
‘Friend, are you saved?’
‘Yes, I am saved.’
‘Praise the Lord! When were you saved?’
‘When Jesus took away my sins on the cross. It was then that God saved me and justified me by Jesus’ blood.’” (Justification – Am I good enough for God?, Rolf Preus, pages 18-19, Northwestern Publishing House).
Universalism in Disguise? Do you see the problem? Though UOJ proponents technically reject universalism (when the subject of universalism is brought up), they also effectively promote it (when not making the connection to universalism). In other words, they do not always seem to be putting two and two together, in the whole of their teaching.
Fact, God’s People Are Prone to Wandering If there is one thing I have learned over the past 20+ years since my Christian conversion, it is this…our own sinful natures, coupled with the influence of Satan, combine to make an often underestimated, yet powerful force which is bound and determined to lead us astray. In all of human history, it’s a fact, many (if not most) of God’s people have been prone to wander to one extent or another.
Here’s what I mean. Today, UOJ proponents openly reject universalism, while subtly they are also being lead astray (by sin and Satan) to promote it at the very same time. Tomorrow (which could be 10, 25 or 50 years from now), UOJ proponents may no longer be rejecting universalism, but instead, may have been led astray, little-by-little, until they have come to openly embrace it.
Today, those who reject UOJ, while members of a UOJ promoting church body, are disfellowshipped for their rejection of UOJ. Tomorrow, those who reject universalism may be disfellowshipped by those same church bodies who will have, at that time, accepted universalism as sound doctrine.
Far more important than remaining in fellowship or being disfellowshipped, however, will be the multitudes who will have been led astray by this false theology to the point of being separated (or remaining separated) from God for eternity. And, all in the name of sound doctrine.
Example 2 As I wrap up the answer to this Q & A question, I will leave you with one more example of UOJ leading to universalism. This too is from a pro-UOJ resource.
“…God has, as a gift of his grace, justified all men, that is, he has declared them righteous and just. As a result, they [what else can “they” refer to but the previous “all men” and “them”?] are awarded life.
Since this is something that has taken place through Jesus’ life death and resurrection and is an objective reality, it may be spoken of as objective justification. It is also called universal atonement.” (Basic Doctrines of the Bible, Armin W. Schuetze, page 42, Northwestern Publishing House). Emphasis and bracketed text are mine.
In addition to calling it “objective justification” and “universal atonement,” I think there is another term for it – “universalism” (in a not-so-subtle disguise).
No Surprise My hope and prayer is that many will begin to see UOJ for what it really is; that they will see that the biblical evidence is overwhelmingly against UOJ and stop proclaiming it to the multitudes. If not, we should not be surprised when many are led astray into universalism in the future.
Every false doctrine, carried to its logical conclusion, ends in spiritual death.
Think about it.
Which is more consistent with the truth of Scripture and therefore less likely to lead people away from the Savior, UOJ or JIC?
Attempts at Defending UOJ How does the proponent of UOJ go about defending UOJ when legitimate questions or objections are raised? Is the UOJ defense valid? Is the defense biblical? Is it based upon sound logic and reasoning, in light of Scripture?
Here, in Category 2 (Analyzing the Defense of UOJ), I have attempted to put forth a number of common defenses given by proponents of UOJ when a legitimated question or an objection is raised, followed by my own analysis of those defenses.
In Category 1, everything was listed in a strictly Q & A format. Here, each listing is in a question/objection, defense, then analysis format (sometimes with multiple defenses and analyses following the same question/objection).
Upon opening each listing you will find 1) the original question/objection restated, 2) additional details about the defense from proponents of UOJ and 3) my analysis of that defense. I encourage you to determine for yourself whether or not each defense of UOJ is a valid one, in light of Scripture and plain reasoning.
Reasonable Doubt Below are a number of commonly used “proof” passages used to support UOJ. With each of these passages of Scripture, much could be said in an effort to disprove or at least raise a reasonable doubt regarding the validity of UOJ. Instead of getting into great detail with each passage, however, I will simply offer here a very brief (as brief as possible, while still giving sufficient detail) analysis regarding the use of each passage as a proof for UOJ.
The Burden of Proof Bear in mind (and this is important), the burden of proof falls on the proponent of UOJ to prove his case from Scripture, not on the one questioning the use of a passage, to disprove it’s use. This is particularly true when the proponent of UOJ is so adamant in his theology, to the point of disfellowshipping those who would question the validity of UOJ, seemingly without serious questioning, analysis, discussion or debate.
UOJ or JIC or…? On this site, I have attempted to share (for a PDF download of the full text of this site that you too can share…or keep for yourself, click here) the teaching of UOJ, along with various problems associated with it .
Additionally, I have attempted to offer a more biblical view of justification (which I have come to call Justification in Christ or JIC – not a new teaching, just a new identifier for the original biblical teaching…in my view) which is consistent with all of Scripture, including those biblical teachings which I have suggested serve to disprove UOJ.
Further, the foundation behind JIC was borrowed from Lutheran theologians who, themselves, were proponents of UOJ. What is that foundation? It is that Christ, himself, had to be vindicated/justified after having become sin for us.
Am I 100% convinced that JIC is the correct way to understand justification? No. But, I do lean heavily in that direction (about 99.9% convinced…I always leave some wiggle room to be corrected on any of my beliefs, but I also know what I believe and why I believe it…and, it’s not just “because my pastor said so.”) based on the biblical witness.
Am I 100% convinced that UOJ is NOT the correct way to understand justification? At this point in time, again I would say 99.9% convinced. And again, I am always willing to consider legitimate arguments from Scripture to the contrary (arguments FROM SCRIPTURE…you caught that, right?) At this point, I have read, researched and prayerfully considered much on the subject of UOJ and have been left thoroughly under-impressed with any supposed biblical arguments.
And, honestly, I don’t really care what other pastors, professors or Lutheran Fathers have to say on the issue unless it is directly taken from God’s word.
My Hope… I hope that this site serves to spark critical thinking on the subject of justification.
I further hope that this site prompts further discussion among Lutherans (theologians and non-theologians), truly willing to openly listen and discuss.
One observation I have made regarding the proponents of UOJ is that most seem over-confident (I’ll refrain from saying arrogant – oh, I guess I just did 😲) in their stance on UOJ. It is assumed that UOJ is the be-all, end-all position on justification. There often seems to be no legitimate consideration given to the possibility that UOJ could be wrong…only that the poor, yet-to-be-convinced, persistent errorist (the one who rejects UOJ) must be wrong.
I would suggest that this is not because the evidence from Scripture compels them to hold so tightly to UOJ (as we have seen some real problems with supposed “proof” passages for UOJ). Rather, I would suggest that these proponents of UOJ are more inclined to hold tightly to UOJ due to pride, tradition, fear of disagreeing with UOJ (and being disfellowshipped), or the like, more than based on the supposed evidence itself (though maybe they have been thoroughly deceived by the enemy).
In this sense, they are akin to the secular scientist who rules out the possibility of a creator before ever looking at the evidence in creation. Just as this is not good science (leading the evidence where you want it to go, rather than following the evidence wherever it leads), so every Christian ought to be readily willing to admit he could be wrong in one way or another and ought to humbly consider another possibility while thoroughly examining all of the biblical witness on the subject.
Should we allow ourselves to be blown back and forth by every wind of teaching? Of course not! But we ought not (dare not) stubbornly refuse to consider real truth, in light of the full testimony of Scripture, either.
Sadly, in regard to UOJ, proponents seem to have closed their eyes and ears to any possibility of being corrected. Zech 7:11 comes to mind:
~ Zech 7:11 But they refused to pay attention and turned a stubborn shoulder; they closed their ears so they could not hear. (CSB)
But, I am fairly confident that not all “proponents” emphatically agree with UOJ (or each other). I hope this site serves to embolden those who quietly disagree with UOJ to come out from hiding and to take a stand for truth…or at least take a stand for legitimate questioning and debate.
Finally, I hope this site serves to glorify God and to bring light to his truth, found in our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
If I Have Failed… If I have, at times spoken too harshly, I apologize. It was not my intention. Though it was my intention to put forth the truth and to put down error plainly and boldly (and hopefully with a bit of levity). I currently stand vehemently opposed to UOJ, but I have done my very best to present information here as honestly and objectively as possible. I have made every effort to avoid name-calling or other derogatory language and the like, while at the same time openly “telling it like it is.” I hope I have successfully shared the truth (as I understand it) in true Christian love and humility. I again, apologize if I have failed at some point.
Blessings God’s blessings to you on your journey of discovery regarding God’s justifying work through Christ. May he lead you to a knowledge of the truth.
~ If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to him. James 1:5 (BSB)
What God Says About Justification Before looking at God’s Word, we must first lay a little ground work.
Under My Skin I once came upon an online debate of UOJ. Strong views were coming from both sides – views from those for and from those against. Part of the discussion centered around the key concept of acquired vs applied (meaning realized, not credited) justification and forgiveness, apart from saving faith.
This discussion of acquired vs applied justification really stuck with me…it got under my skin, so to speak. Then, the light bulb went on and it struck me that, “This is it!” This is what the whole debate comes down to.
Did Christ only acquire justification for all (to be credited through saving faith) or did God apply (realize) justification for each and every individual, even for those still in unbelief?
Various arguments were made for each side of the acquired/applied debate, yet as I recall, most (if not all) were arguments from reason and logic rather than from Scripture.
But, what if it’s all right there in God’s word? Further, what if it’s not an either/or equation, but a both/and equation?
What do I mean?
Pause… UOJ is effectively a Lutheran doctrine (at least as it is spoken of on this site). As such, I recognize that I am writing primarily to Lutherans – Lutherans who are often accustomed to quoting Luther, the Confessions and/or other “Lutheran Fathers” nearly as often as (if not more often than) Scripture when it comes to a discussion of UOJ. On this site, little attention is given to these extra-biblical sources (the words of men), while heavy emphasis is given to Scripture (the Word of God)…gasp. 😮
Having said that, I would like to introduce our investigation of Scripture by utilizing one single quote from Luther to set up a biblical discussion.
Luther on Acquired vs Applied
“It is a faithful saying that Christ has accomplished everything, has removed sin and overcome every enemy, so that through Him we are lords over all things. But the treasure lies yet in one pile; it is not yet distributed nor invested. Consequently, ifwe are to possess it, the Holy Spirit must come and teach our hearts to believe and say: I, too, am one of those who are to have this treasure. When we feel that God has thus helped us and given the treasure to us, everything goes well…” Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 279. Pentecost Sunday. John 14:23-31.J-528 (Emphasis is mine)
Note that Luther states that this treasure lies in one pile and has not yet been distributed nor invested. In other words, it seems he is saying this treasure has been acquired, yet seemingly not made a reality (applied) for each and every individual’s personal existence, including the unbeliever….until faith apprehends it. Remember, it’s just “lyin’ around in a pile.”
Ah, ah, ah…I can practically see the expressions on some of your faces as you’re already conjuring up your refutation of what I’ve just said. You have no idea where I’m going with this, so just hold your horses and keep following along.
Where was I?
Ah, yes, it sounds like Luther disagrees with UOJ, but wait, there’s more.
Luther goes on to tell us how we come to possess this treasure (through faith/believing). He does this even though he began his statement by also recognizing and acknowledging that Christ has accomplished everything, which includes removing sin. What’s this? Everything accomplished? The removal of sin? This sounds similar to arguments made by proponents of UOJ.
So, which is it? Does Luther agree or disagree with UOJ?
Here we have Luther acknowledging that Christ’s work is both fully accomplished (including the removal of sin), yet this treasure still needs to be distributed from the pile it is just lyin’ around in.
Consider this…although Luther seems to recognize that this treasure is acquired and not yet applied for each and every person, he states that this treasure is to be found (so to speak) in a pile. I would suggest, however, that Scripture speaks of a much better “place” to find this treasure rather than in Luther’s “pile.” Let’s take a look.
Turning To God’s Word First things first. What happened at the cross?
~ God made him who had no sinto be sinfor us. 2 Co 5:21a
Here we learn…that 1) Christ was, in-and-of-himself, without sin and 2) he became sin for us.
Therefore, we can say that according to his own life under the law, Jesus was without sin. He was sinless. Yet, we can also legitimately say that at the cross Jesus became sin. He became actually guilty of all sin. In fact, he became every sinner’s sin. Jesus did not go to the cross merely carrying our sin as though he put our sins in a bag and slung them over his shoulder. No! He became sin.
At the cross, Jesus became actually and fully guilty of all sin of all time. It was as though he had become a murderer, a blasphemer, a thief and a liar. Not because he was guilty of sin in-and-of-himself, but because he became so totally and completely intertwined with all of humanity that he became full guilty – fully sinful – in your place and mine. Therefore, God the Father could rightly and justly pour out the full force of his wrath on Jesus in our place. More than this, God could now legitimately justify and forgive each of us because of what had happened to Christ. Christ became sin.
Now, if we have that squared away in our thinking, let’s see what happened next. Note that these first two verses are agreed upon by many theologians (Lutheran or otherwise) as referring to Christ (“me” = Christ).
~ He who vindicatesmeis near. Isaiah 50:8a
~ Without controversy, the mystery of godliness is great: God was revealed in the flesh, justified [vindicated] in the spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, and received up in glory. 1 Tim 3:16 (WEB) Bracketed note is mine.
A number of Lutheran scholars have concluded (and I agree) that the gist of these verses is that after Christ died guilty of our sin, he, himself, needed to be justified (vindicated) on our behalf. Christ, himself, needed to be declared “right with God,” having paid the full penalty for sin.
Where Is Justification Found? This being the case, the question becomes, “Where is our justification to be found?”
Sadly, proponents of UOJ would emphatically state (numerous people have been disfellowshipped for disagreeing) that this justification has been made a reality (applied though, not fully credited) for all people, including the unbeliever. From a UOJ perspective, it is assumed that Christ’s own justification (vindication) automatically equates to the justification (vindication) of all people.
“In other words, what if God has not applied justification, forgiveness and righteous to each unbeliever’s personal account, but instead has applied AND credited each unbeliever’s personal justification, forgiveness and righteousness to…
I’m going to pause and repeat that in a different way so as to encourage you to truly ponder what I’ve just said. UOJ A-S-S-U-M-E-S (it does not prove) the justification of Christ automatically equates to the justification of all. That is an enormous assumption!
Here are, quite possibly two of the most important questions you will ever hear regarding the topic of justification.
Does Christ’s justification = the justification of all, or does it simply mean Christ, himself, has been justified on behalf of all?
Does forgiven sin automatically = forgiven sinners?
In other words, in answer to our previous question (Where is our justification to be found?), proponents of UOJ conclude our justification is found in each and every individual – having been applied to the believer and the unbeliever alike. Though somehow not fully credited apart from faith.
But is this true? Or, is it over-reaching as a flawed interpretation of Scripture? Is it being read into the text, rather than drawn from the text?
Is Justification Found In A Pile? What about Luther?
Is justification like a treasure “lying in a pile” as Luther suggests? Or, does Scripture offer us a better/fuller solution?
Soooo…does this treasure (our justification) lie in a pile? Hmmm. What if it is to be found stored up (so to speak) not in a place, but in a person? And, what if it were not only our justification, but also our forgiveness, our redemption, our acquittal, our righteousness, our life, our salvation and on and on…? What if all are to be found, not in a pile, but in Christ ? Now, there’s a radical thought. 😮
Further, what if one could argue that justification, forgiveness and righteousness have not only been acquired but fully applied and credited?
Oh, but let’s be careful….
I am not suggesting that these have been applied and credited to each and every individual, rather that they have been applied and credited to one account and one account only…until, through faith, each is distributed to each individual believer’s account.
Is Justification Found In A Person?
Think of it this way (here it comes…this is my favorite part 😁), what if God has not applied justification, forgiveness and righteous to each unbeliever’s personal account, but instead has applied AND credited each unbeliever’s personal justification, forgiveness and righteousness to Christ’s account?
Stop…let that sink in.
What if this were essentially what so many proponents of JBFA have been trying to suggest for years, but without fully gasping all of the details in their own theology? What if we were to give these details a name and call them “Justification In Christ” (JIC)? And, what if this justification were both applied AND credited to each individual’s account exclusively by or through faith A-L-O-N-E?
What if the truth of Scripture actually brings both sides of the debate together? What if, in a very real sense, JBFA and UOJ are both true?
Don’t Take My Word For It Is this a viable possibility? Maybe you don’t believe me? Good! You shouldn’t take my word for it. How about looking to God’s word instead?
Please pay careful attention! The following is what God has to say about justification, forgiveness, righteousness, etc…like it or not…believe it or not. This is what we might call God’s objective truth on the matter…will you subjectively believe it?
Where is our justification and redemption to be found? God’s, answer…in Christ.
~ For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in ChristJesus.Ro 3:23-24 (NKJV)
Where is our reconciliation to be found? Again…in Christ.
~ All this is from God, who reconciled usto himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the worldto himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them. 2 Co 5:18-19
Where is our forgiveness? In Christ.
~ Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in ChristGod forgaveyou. Eph 4:32
Where is our salvation? In Christ.
~ Therefore I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they too may obtain the salvationthat is in ChristJesus, with eternal glory. 2 Tim 2:10
Where is our righteousness? In Christ.
~ We proclaim him, admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom, so that we may present everyone perfect in Christ. Col 1:28
~ God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him[in Christ] we might becomethe righteousness of God.2 Co 5:21
→ How do we come to be in Christ ? Well, you must decide for yourself in light of Scripture, but I would argue it comes by way of the means of grace through faith. (See next verse, as well as, “How do we come to be in Christ?” below.)
~ For all of you who were baptized into Christhave clothed yourselves with Christ. Gal 3:27-28
Where is our new life/eternal life? In Christ.
~ In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to Godin ChristJesus. Ro 6:11
~ Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come! 2 Co 5:17
~ Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, according to the promise of life that isin ChristJesus. 2 Tim 1:1
Where are our spiritual wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, redemption, forgiveness and grace to be found? You guessed it…in Christ.
~ And because of him you are in ChristJesus, who became to uswisdom from God, righteousnessand sanctificationand redemption.1 Co 1:30
~ To the church of God in Corinth, to those sanctified in ChristJesus. 1 Co 1:2
~ In himwe have redemptionthrough his blood, the forgivenessof sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace. Eph 1:7
In fact, where are all of the incomparable riches of God’s grace to be found? In Christ, of course.
~ You then, my son, be strong in the gracethat is in ChristJesus. 2 Tim 2:1
~ I always thank God for you because of his gracegiven you in ChristJesus. 1 Co 1:4
~ In order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in ChristJesus. Eph 2:7
What is the real object of our faith? Our own faith? Our justification? Our forgiveness? UOJ? No. Let me ask it another way. Where are all of the promises of God found and fulfilled? In Christ.
~ For no matter how many promisesGod has made, they are “Yes” in Christ. 2 Co 1:20
In Christ, we are seated in the heavenly realms. Pause and allow that one to sink in. This, quite possibly, best demonstrates the point I am attempting to make with all of this.Every spiritual blessing anyone could ever hope to have or imagine is so wrapped up in, hidden in, and encapsulated in Christ, that we (as believers) are even in heaven right this very minute…in Christ (go wrap your head around that one).If this is true, how much more is our forgiveness, righteousness, acquittal, justification, etc. all wrapped up in, hidden in, and encapsulated in Christ?
~ And God raised usup with Christand seated us with himin the heavenly realms in ChristJesus. Eph 2:6
Though it be a mystery, the mystery is solved in Christ.
~ And he made known to us the mystery of his willaccording to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ. Eph 1:9
In Christ, every spiritual blessing is found and accomplished.
~ Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ. Eph 1:3
~ According to his eternal purpose which he accomplishedin ChristJesus our Lord. Eph 3:11
How do we come to be in Christ?
~ And you also were included in Christwhen you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Eph 1:13
And, in Christ, we find our peace.
~ And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your mindsin ChristJesus. Phil 4:7
~ Peace to allof you who are in Christ. 1 Peter 5:14
Whew! That was a lot. Wasn’t it so cool, though? Isn’t it awesome when we just allow God to do all of the talking on the subject of justification (or anything else)? Did I mention, that this is my favorite part of this site?
But wait…there’s still more.
Outside of Christ What about those who are not in Christ? Do they stand acquitted, forgiven, righteous and justified?
~ The Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteousfor the day of judgment. 2 Pt 2:9
~ Do you not know that the unrighteouswill not inherit the kingdom of God? 1 Co 6:9 (NKJV)
~ Whoever does not believe stands condemnedalreadybecause he has not believedin the name of God’s one and only Son. Jn 3:18
~ Whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remainson him. Jn 3:36
~ When he [the Spirit] comes, he will convictthe world of guiltin regard to sinand righteousness and judgment: in regard to sin, because men do not believe in me. Jn 16:8-9
~ If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven. Jn 20:23
Though proponents of UOJ think they have a valid response to these last 6 passages, there are serious flaws in the proposed solution (see Q & A, Category 1, Questions 4 & 5).
Conclusion Nowhere in Scripture does God inform us that he has justified the whole world (as you’ll see when we get to the UOJ Proof Passages section of the site) other than with a justification that remains exclusively in Christ until distributed by faith. In other words, what God does say is that he has justified Christ and as a result, he justifies those who are in Christ.
~ He who vindicatesme [Christ] is near. Isaiah 50:8a
~ Without controversy, the mystery of godliness is great: God was revealed in the flesh, justified in the spirit…. 1 Tim 3:16 (WEB)
~ [All] being justified freely by his grace through the redemption which [is] in Christ Jesus; whom God has set forth a mercy-seat, through faith in his blood. Romans 3:24-25a (Darby)
~ Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.Romans 8:1
~ And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit. Ephesians 1:13
~ For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified. Romans 10:10
Maybe it’s just me, but I can’t help but to conclude that the testimony of Scripture is clear. As Christians, every blessing we have, everything we hope for, indeed, everything we are, is all wrapped up and encapsulated (I love that word in this context) only in Christ.
It looks something like this:
Table 3
In keeping with JIC, one could legitimately argue that it would be correct to tell the unbeliever that God has fully and freely forgiven him in Christ.
On the other hand, one could also legitimately argue that it would be just as valid to tell the unbeliever, God will forgive him if/when he is granted the gift of faith in Christ.
For the record (just in case you were keeping a record), I didn’t come up with this stuff on my own. I did not come up with this just to create some theoretically viable way of bringing opponents from both sides together. (In fact, truth be told, I am loath to think of this as a possible form – though a very different form – of UOJ even though it would also serve as a form of JBFA. For years, I resisted presenting this truth in this way, because I became so opposed to UOJ.) Having said that, the reality is this…this is what the text of Scripture teaches. Go read the passages for yourself in context and see if they don’t still hold the same meaning compared to that which I have suggested.
Our justification, forgiveness and righteousness are found in Christ…A-L-O-N-E!
I don’t see any way around it. (Though I’m sure many will cling to their previously held beliefs, over clinging to Scripture.)
Moreover, our good, gracious and just God has not granted these things to those who are not in Christ. Instead unbelievers remain separated, outside of this treasure which God has undeservedly bestowed upon those whom he has brought to himself…brought to himself, in Christ. The treasure is there for all. It is ready and waiting. It is a real (realized, actualized, not potential – more on this later) treasure. It is a treasure that lies, not in a pile, but in a person. It is distributed (credited) to individuals, freely by his grace through faith and through faith alone.
But again, maybe that’s just me. As a Christian, you’ll have to decide for yourself how man comes to be forgiven, justified, acquitted, made righteous and the like. But as for me and my household, we’re going to cling to Christ as the object of our faith…not to faith itself…not to the false misleading doctrine of UOJ, not even to JBFA…not to anything else, but to Christ and to Christ alone.
Here we stand. We can do no other.
What about you?
X
Due to certain features used, this site is best viewed on computer or tablet (horizontally). Phone? Not so much...just sayin'.